Juneau,
Alaska. The recent seizure of a stateless ship in international waters 4,200
kilometers off Alaska's coast has spotlighted the challenge that the United
States and other nations face in trying to crack down on illegal fishing, an
activity that accounts for up to $23.5 billion a year in global economic
losses.
Finding
rogue vessels in the vast, open ocean can be like finding a needle in a
haystack. But US officials and some environmentalists say progress is being
made, including multinational patrol and enforcement agreements and the
potential for sanctions against countries that engage in illegal, unreported
and unregulated (or IUU) fishing.
More
countries are joining the efforts and there is greater awareness of the illegal
fishing issue in the US and Europe, where patrons ask restaurants and shops for
the source of their product.
There are
efforts to better track high-value products like bluefin tuna to ensure they
were obtained legally, and to keep illegal product out, said Rebecca Lent,
director of the Office of International Affairs for National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Fisheries.
Such
efforts are important because "we can't be out there all the time,
watching the boats," she said.
"I
think there's been progress [but] we have to continue; you can't let your guard
down," Lent said. "It's like any place where you might have crime or
illegal activity. You just have to stay vigilant, if you will."
The seizure
of the Bangun Perkasa was the first of a suspected illegal fishing vessel by
the US Coast Guard since 2008.
The ship
was spotted by a Japanese aircraft on Aug. 31 and seized by the Coast Guard on
Sept. 7, under an agreement that includes annual patrols of international
waters of the Pacific to look for illegal drift-netting. High-seas drift nets
are often referred to as "the wall of death" because they capture
myriad species the pirates don't intend to use. The United Nations has banned
drift netting.
The drift
net on the Bangun Perkasa was about 16 kilometers long and crew members cut it
in an attempt to flee, said Capt. Craig Lloyd, chief of response for the Coast
Guard in Alaska. Authorities were able to stop the vessel but a second ship in
the area got away, he said.
The Coast
Guard reported that 30 tons of squid and about 30 shark carcasses were onboard
the rat-infested ship. The vessel arrived near Dutch Harbor in southwest Alaska
last weekend after a laborious escort that included two Coast Guard
cutters.
NOAA
Fisheries must decide what to do with the ship and catch once the rats are
eradicated and the boat is in good enough shape to be brought closer to shore.
Alaska law forbids ships with rats from entering state waters.
The Coast
Guard said the crew initially claimed the vessel was from Indonesia but
Indonesian officials did not claim it. In the case of a stateless vessel, the
US can impose its own law, Lloyd said.
The 22 crew
members are from China, Vietnam, Taiwan and Indonesia, the Coast Guard said.
Authorities investigating the case are expected to forward their findings to
the US attorney's office.
Lloyd
called the seizure a big win for the international community and for
law-abiding fishermen. Still, statistics are elusive as to whether enforcement
actions are having a significant impact on the problem.
The US
Commerce Department in a report to Congress this year said that since IUU
fishing activities are generally carried out covertly monitoring and detection
are difficult.
Estimates
suggest global economic losses due to illegal fishing could be as high as $23.5
billion a year, with the problem a particular concern in the waters off
developing countries. John Hocevar, oceans campaign director for the
environmental group Greenpeace USA, said losses to sub-Sahara Africa alone are
estimated at over $1 billion annually.
The toll
taken by pirate fishing can't be overstated, he said: Fisheries are being
depleted, many countries lack the resources to monitor and enforce illegal
fishing in their waters, and large ships and powerful gear allow pirates to go
farther out on the high seas, meaning, "fish literally have no place to
hide."
He cited a
concern with sharks, often targeted because they're prized for shark-fin soup.
Sharks have low reproductive rates, he said, leaving them vulnerable if their
numbers steeply decline.
Lent said
her agency plans to propose expanding the definition of IUU fishing to include
protections for sharks.
Earlier
this year, the Commerce Department reported that it had identified six
countries as having engaged in IUU fishing in 2009 or 2010: Colombia, Ecuador,
Italy, Panama, Portugal and Venezuela. Twelve other countries were considered
but either the allegations were refuted or the nations involved said they'd
acted to address the concern.
Italy,
Panama and four other countries — France, Libya, China and Tunisia — were
identified in a 2009 report to Congress. But in each case of verified
violations, the countries took action against the vessels or persons involved
and showed proof of their own efforts, according to the Commerce Department.
Countries
that do not comply run the risk of sanctions including a block on imports. Hocevar said the federal government now has
strong tools to hold other countries accountable if they're supporting illegal
fishing. And he thinks NOAA is doing a good job in addressing the problem.
New
technology to monitor vessels and attention to the issue by the United Nations
helps, too.
"But
the fact is, we still have a multibillion-dollar problem on our hands," he
said, "and we still have a long way to go."
Associated Press
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.