guardian.co.uk,
Peter Beaumont, Saturday 31 March 2012
![]() |
| A study of bottlenose dolphins in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, showed that many of the marine mammals were suffering from lung and liver disease. Photograph: Alamy |
A new study
of dolphins living close to the site of North America's worst ever oil spill –
the BP Deepwater Horizon catastrophe two years ago – has established serious
health problems afflicting the marine mammals.
The report,
commissioned by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA],
found that many of the 32 dolphins studied were underweight, anaemic and
suffering from lung and liver disease, while nearly half had low levels of a
hormone that helps the mammals deal with stress as well as regulating their
metabolism and immune systems.
More than
200m gallons of crude oil flowed from the well after a series of explosions on
20 April 2010, which killed 11 workers. The spill contaminated the Gulf of
Mexico and its coastline in what President Barack Obama called America's worst
environmental disaster.
The
research follows the publication of several scientific studies into insect
populations on the nearby Gulf coastline and into the health of deepwater coral
populations, which all suggest that the environmental impact of the five-month
long spill may have been far worse than previously appreciated.
Another
study confirmed that zooplankton – the microscopic organisms at the bottom of
the ocean food chain – had also been contaminated with oil. Indeed, photographs
issued last month of wetland coastal areas show continued contamination, with
some areas still devoid of vegetation.
The study
of the dolphins in Barataria Bay, off the coast of Louisiana, followed two
years in which the number of dead dolphins found stranded on the coast close to
the spill had dramatically increased. Although all but one of the 32 dolphins
were still alive when the study ended, lead researcher Lori Schwacke said
survival prospects for many were grim, adding that the hormone deficiency –
while not definitively linked to the oil spill – was "consistent with oil
exposure to other mammals".
Schwacke
told a Colorado based-publication last week: "This was truly an
unprecedented event – there was little existing data that would indicate what
effects might be seen specifically in dolphins – or other cetaceans – exposed
to oil for a prolonged period of time."
The NOAA
study has been reported at the same time as two other studies suggesting that
the long-term environmental effects of the Deepwater Horizon spill may have
been far more profound than previously thought.
A study of
deep ocean corals seven miles from the spill source jointly funded by the NOAA
and BP has found dead and dying corals coated "in brown gunk".
Deepwater corals are not usually affected in oil spills, but the depth and
temperatures involved in the spill appear to have been responsible for creating
plumes of oil particles deep under the ocean surface, which are blamed for the
unprecedented damage.
Charles
Fisher, one of the scientists who jointly described the impact as
unprecedented, said he believed the colony had been contaminated by a plume
from the ruptured well which would have affected other organisms. "The
corals are long-living and don't move. That is why we were able to identify the
damage but you would have expected it to have had an impact on other larger
animals that were exposed to it."
Chemical
analysis of oil found on the dying coral showed that it came from the Deepwater
Horizon spill.
The latest
surveys of the damage to the marine environment come amid continued legal
wrangling between the US and BP over the bill for the clean-up. BP said the US
government was withholding evidence that would show the oil spill from the well
in the Gulf of Mexico was smaller than claimed. Last week BP, which has set
aside $37bn (£23bn) to pay for costs associated with the disaster, went to court
in Louisiana to demand access to thousands of documents that it says the Obama
administration is suppressing.
The US
government is still pursuing a case against BP despite a deal the company
reached at the beginning of March with the largest group of private claimants.
That $7.8bn deal, however, does not address "significant damages" to
the environment after the spill for which BP has not admitted liability. And it
has not only been the immediate marine environment that has been affected. A
study of insect populations in the coastal marshes affected by the catastrophe
has also identified significant impact.
Linda
Hooper-Bui of Louisiana State University found that some kinds of insect and
spider were far less numerous than before. "Every single time we go out
there, the Pollyanna part of me thinks, 'Now we're going to measure
recovery'," she said. "Then I get out there and say: 'Whaaat?'"
She had
expected that one group of arthropods might be hit hard while others recovered,
but her work, still incomplete, shows a large downturn among many kinds.
"We never thought it would be this big, this widespread," she said.
For its
part BP has claimed in a recent statement that it has worked hard to fulfil its
responsibility to clean up after the spill. "From the beginning, BP
stepped up to meet our obligations to the communities in the Gulf Coast region,
and we've worked hard to deliver on that commitment for nearly two years,"
BP chief executive Bob Dudley declared recently.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.