Related
Stories
- Total guilty of French oil spill
- French struggle to contain oil spill
- Analysis: Tightening rules on tankers
![]() |
| The 25-year-old Erika broke in two in violent seas in the Bay of Biscay in December 1999 |
France's
top court has upheld fines imposed on the French oil giant Total for an oil
disaster in 1999.
The tanker
Erika sank off the coast of Brittany dumping 30,000 barrels of heavy fuel oil
into the Atlantic sea.
Total was
convicted of negligence in 2008 for overlooking maintenance problems of the
ship it had chartered.
Total had
argued that since the ship had gone down in international waters and was flying
a Maltese flag, French courts did not have jurisdiction.
Campaign
groups said that if Total had been absolved of blame for this disaster, 30
years of environmental protection law would have been undermined.
"This
is a decision that will make all oil companies think deeply about the
organisation of maritime transport," Jean-Pierre Mignard, a lawyer for
several coastal districts affected, was quoted by Agence France Presse as
saying.
Huge fines
The Erika
sank 75km (45 miles) off the coast of Brittany in December 1999, contaminating
400km of coastline in one of France's worst environmental disasters.
In 2008,
Total, the Erika's owner and its manager, were found guilty of negligence, as
was Rina, the Italian company that declared the Erika seaworthy.
Total was
fined 375,000 euros (£280,000) and ordered to pay nearly 200m euros in damages
to the French state and the local fishing industry.
All the
convictions were upheld in latest ruling by the Court of Cassation.
Earlier
this year, the chief prosecutor encouraged the court to find in Total's favour,
says the BBC's Christian Fraser in Paris.
The court
ignored him - but this ruling does not conceal the ongoing difficulties in
assigning jurisdiction when a ship sinks outside territorial waters, our
correspondent says.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.