Google – AFP, Peter Brieger and Hiroshi Hiyama (AFP), 3 April 2013
![]() |
Japanese
fishermen slaughter a bottlenose whale east of Tokyo on June 25,
2008
(AFP/File, Yoshikazu Tsuno)
|
TOKYO —
Japan says the work that goes on at the Institute of Cetacean Research is
crucial for studying whale populations; critics counter it is a way to get
around an international ban on commercial whaling.
The
institute can be found in a nondescript white-brick office building in Tokyo's
port district.
Down a
hallway and through an unmarked door is a small lobby with a model ship, a
poster showing various whale species, and a sign that reads "Keep
Out".
Captured
whales are studied by the Institute, which refers to its work on them as
"lethal research" before their meat is sold across Japan, including
in restaurants in nearby Tsukiji market, where a sushi-style piece of the
purple flesh costs a few dollars.
![]() |
An
anti-whaling ship (C) comes between
the Nisshin Maru and its fuel tanker, on
February 25, 2013 (INSTITUTE OF
CETACEAN RESEARCH/AFP/File,
Institute Of
Cetacean Research)
|
"What
are you doing here? You are not supposed to be here. You have to leave,"
one said in English.
When told
the taxpayer-funded institute had not responded to AFP's interview requests, he
said: "That means no. It means we're not interested."
Norway and
Iceland are the only other nations that hunt whales in open defiance of a 1986
moratorium, and Japan's annual hunt has drawn criticism from both activists and
foreign governments.
But the
Institute insists "anti-whaling is not 'world opinion'".
"Rather,
it is a predominantly Western phenomenon in developed countries amplified by
anti-whaling fundraising NGOs (non-governmental organisations) and the Western
media," it says on its website, pointing to hundreds of whaling research
papers.
"The
purpose of Japan's research is science -- science that will ensure that when
commercial whaling is resumed it will be sustainable."
What Japan
sees as research is at the heart of a bitter grudge match between militant
activists intent on ending the nation's annual whale hunt and an equally
determined Tokyo, which dismisses the campaigners as "terrorists".
Japan's
whaling fleet left port in December aiming to catch about 1,000 whales in the
icy waters of the Antarctic, where they are regularly pursued by militant
environmentalist group Sea Shepherd. Activists said this year's hunt ended in
March with no more than 75 whales killed.
They have
clashed violently in exchanges that have in the past seen stink bombs thrown at
Japanese crew and water jets trained on protesters. The bitter fight has also
reached the legal arena with both sides launching lawsuits.
![]() |
Minke whale
(AFP Graphic)
|
Tokyo says
that researching the mammals is "perfectly legal" under international
whaling rules, as is selling meat by-products. Organs including ovaries and
stomach contents are crucial for research, the Institute says.
"Some
indispensable data have to be collected by lethal means, which simply cannot be
obtained by non-lethal means," it says, adding that death "is as
rapid as possible".
"A
large proportion of the whales taken are killed instantly by an explosive
harpoon".
Critics
question what remains for the Institute to conclude about sustainable whale
populations after carrying out its research in the decades since the moratorium
on international whaling was established.
"They
(the Institute) don't really have an argument to justify themselves
anymore," said Junichi Sato, executive director of Greenpeace Japan.
"If
they can't get enough data by killing thousands of whales, then that is a
failure of the science," he said.
But
"it's about pride. Japan has been claiming this is part of Japanese
culture. Once you raise that issue, it's very difficult to back down."
![]() |
Crew of
Japan's whale research vessels at
a returning ceremony at Tokyo port on
September 21, 2000 (AFP/File, Toshifumi
Kitamura)
|
There was
little appetite among private firms to restart commercial whaling given the
prohibitive expense, Sato said.
However,
Fisheries minister Yoshimasa Hayashi recently told AFP in an interview that the
hunt would continue, dismissing anti-whaling voices as "a cultural attack,
a kind of prejudice against Japanese culture".
In the
narrow streets around Tsukiji market, billed as the world's biggest fish
emporium, that view was echoed by some who defended whaling as an important
tradition, albeit a fading one.
Others
feared job losses in the whaling sector if the hunt ended and criticised
activists' in-your-face approach -- even if they had little affection for whale
meat itself.
"It is
Japanese food culture," said 45-year-old Miuka Arita.
"People
who decide they want to eat it should be allowed to do so. Just because
(activists) didn't grow up eating it does not justify the aggressive actions
they take," she said.
Tamie Sawai
doesn't think much of "dangerous actions" by conservationists either.
But the 83-year-old added that she had not eaten whale meat in years.
"Its
bacon was quite good, but I don't have any strong sense of nostalgia for whale
meat," she said.





No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.