Conservationists
take World Association of Zoos and Aquariums to court for allegedly sanctioning
a deal with fishermen in which dolphins were selected for capture
The Guardian, Oliver Milman and Justin McCurry, Monday 23 March 2015
![]() |
| Dolphins are selected during the annual hunt in Taiji, Japan, in 2014. Photograph: Sea Shepherd/EPA |
The world’s
leading zoo organisation has been accused of being complicit in the infamous
dolphin hunts in Taiji, Japan, by helping secure captured dolphins for one of
its members, despite publicly condemning the practice.
The World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (Waza) is being taken to a Swiss court by
conservationists who accuse it of misleading conduct over its stance on the
Taiji dolphin hunts, which gained global attention through the documentary TheCove.
Waza is
accused of sanctioning a private deal involving the fishermen who herd and
slaughter the dolphins and the Japanese Association of Zoos and Aquariums
(Jaza), which is an associate Waza member.
Waza’s code
of ethics labels the dolphin hunts “inherently cruel”, but it allegedly agreed
a “dolphin management protocol” with Jaza in 2009 that involved a “gentler”
method of herding small numbers of dolphins towards shore where they would be
captured for aquariums.
At a
meeting in August Waza suggested a two-year moratorium on dolphin drive hunts,
but this was rejected by Jaza, Waza said. Instead, Jaza proposed – and Waza
allegedly agreed – that during September no dolphins would be killed, but Jaza
would get first pick of those that were rounded up, in large numbers if
necessary.
After that,
three other organisations – Dolphin Resort, Dolphin Base and the Taiji Town
Development Public Corporation – could purchase excess animals, with the rest
released. Conservationists claim conditions at these aquariums, including the
37 Jaza member aquariums that take dolphins from Taiji, are terrible.
Waza has
previously said the dolphin hunts were part of a Japanese cultural tradition
stretching back “centuries”, but wildlife campaigners insist records in Taiji
show that the first large-scale hunts started in 1969 and have been primarily
driven by the desire to capture animals for exhibit, rather than for meat.
The capture
of dolphins is said to have doubled in the past 10 years. A fully trained
dolphin on public display can be worth more than $100,000, compared with as
little as $100 if butchered for meat. Anti-hunt campaigners say the market for
captured dolphins in China is growing rapidly.
Over the
past five years, observers say, more than 5,000 dolphins have been killed at
Taiji, with a further 750 captured for aquariums. Since the August 2014
agreement, 751 dolphins have been killed, with 41 bottlenose dolphins captured.
The herding
and slaughter of dolphins, highlighted by The Cove, has provoked outrage among
animal welfare groups and some governments. In August, Caroline Kennedy, the US
ambassador to Japan, caused a minor diplomatic rumpus when she tweeted that she
was “deeply concerned by inhumaneness of drive hunt dolphin killing”.
During the
hunts, dolphins are forced into shallow coves by boats, with fishermen banging
metal pipes in the water. They are then slaughtered with knives or hoisted out
of the water for capture, with buyers from aquariums picking their favoured
animals to perform various tricks for audiences.
Marine
scientists maintain the capture process imposes huge physiological stress upon
dolphins and increases their chances of dying once they are in captivity –
hence the need to constantly replenish stocks from the wild.
“I’ve
observed the hunts and seen dolphins being hit by propellers, hit by boats,
flung onto the rocks, they are horrific,” said Sarah Lucas, the head of
Australians for Dolphins, the conservation group that has filed court action
against Waza.
Lucas said
the legal action, filed with the Geneva civil court, aimed to force Waza to
enforce its code of ethics, or to expel Jaza.
“For Waza
to present itself as an animal welfare and conservation organisation and on the
other hand support a member involved in one of the cruellest practices in the
world, to the extent of helping them get preferential purchasing positions, is
deceptive and harmful to the efforts to put the hunts to an end,” Lucas said.
“Most zoos
and aquariums around the world have no idea how Waza conducts itself behind
closed doors. They will be very surprised to learn this.”
Waza has
more than 20 associate members, including Jaza and the European Association of
Zoos and Aquaria, as well as 300 individual zoo members, including London Zoo,
the Zoological Society of San Diego, Toronto Zoo, Bronx Zoo and Melbourne Zoo.
Courtney
Vail, the programs and campaigns manager at US-based Whale and Dolphin Conservation, said Waza’s actions were “beyond comprehension”.
“They seek
to separate killing from acquisition, which is irrational as the methods
utilised in driving and herding are the same,” she said. “Waza’s approach is
not only encouraging additional hunts, it’s actually endorsing this method as a
legitimate way to capture dolphins. Waza is complicit in this.”
A Japanese
NGO, the Elsa Nature Conservancy, said Jaza had confirmed to it that Waza had
agreed at the August meeting to the priority purchasing agreement. It said Waza
also agreed that large pods, rather than the supposedly more humane smaller
groups, of dolphins could be rounded up for Jaza to purchase.
The
chairman of Jaza, Kazutoshi Arai, confirmed to the Guardian that Jaza had the
first pick of bottlenose dolphins during September.
“We select
the dolphins and the rest are released, but only during September,” he said. He
acknowledged that during that month there were no limits on the size of the
pods that fishermen could drive into the bay.
Arai
insisted Waza did not explicitly voice an opinion on the new arrangements, or
on giving Jaza and the Taiji organisations priority on procuring animals.
“Using
separate drive hunts only for dolphins that will be bought by Jaza members is
better, as long as everything is done to safeguard the animals’ welfare,” he
said. “In this way we have responded to Waza’s requests to change the way we do
things.
“The
killing of dolphins in Japan is approved by the government, so that’s not
Waza’s concern. Waza’s business is live capture. The two [killing and live
capture] were mixed up before and that caused problems for zoos and aquariums.
“But if we
separate live capture it’s much less of a problem.”
Waza
officials reportedly told Jaza in October it still had not gone far enough in
devising a humane way of procuring live dolphins.
In
February, Jaza submitted a fresh report on its new method of live capture that
is being discussed by Waza officials. Arai said Jaza had also asked Taiji
fishermen not to separate bottlenose dolphin mothers from their calves.
The
executive director of Waza, Gerard Dick, said the organisation had tried to
influence Jaza to phase out drive hunts.
“Waza is
not in any way or form participating in the drive hunts,” he said.
“We were
informed by Jaza that there is a change of catching practices planned, implying
that in the month of September only bottlenose dolphins shall be taken alive by
Japanese aquariums,” he said. “No lethal takes would occur during this month.
“Waza has
continuously tried to influence Jaza in order to eventually phase out the
acquisition of dolphins by Japanese aquariums. Waza suggested a proposal to
establish a two-year moratorium but this was unfortunately not acceptable.”

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.