Yahoo – AFP, Martin Parry, December 22, 2015
Australia on Tuesday approved a controversial port expansion to support mining projects and the dredging of 1.1 million cubic metres (2.4 million cubic feet) of spoil despite fears it threatens the Great Barrier Reef.
Australia on Tuesday approved a controversial port expansion to support mining projects and the dredging of 1.1 million cubic metres (2.4 million cubic feet) of spoil despite fears it threatens the Great Barrier Reef.
The
decision, creating a huge port capable of handling up to 120 million tonnes of
coal per annum, comes two months after the government green-lighted an
Indian-backed plan to build one of the world's biggest mines in the same area
of Queensland state.
The
Aus$16.5 billion (US$12.1 billion) Carmichael project by Adani Enterprises in
the Galilee Basin, home to vast coal reserves, has attracted fierce criticism,
requiring the fossil fuel to be shipped through the deepwater Abbot Point Coal
Terminal which is currently at capacity.
Environmentalists
have argued that any expansion at Abbot Point risked the World Heritage-listed
reef's health and would destroy local habitats.
![]() |
Environmentalists
argue that any expansion
at Abbot Point risks the health of the World
Heritage-listed Great Barrier Reef and
destroy local habitats (AFP Photo/Peter
Parks)
|
Earlier
plans were for at least three million cubic metres of material to be dredged
and dumped into waters around the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, but this was
later abandoned after an outcry.
The
approval now permits 1.1 million cubic metres to be dredged, allowing more
freighters to dock at Abbot Point, near the town of Bowen, but spoil must be
disposed of on existing industrial land.
"No
dredge material will be placed in the World Heritage Area or the Caley Valley
Wetlands," said Hunt's spokeswoman. "The port area is at least 20
kilometres (12.4 miles) from any coral reef and no coral reef will be
impacted."
The
decision comes barely a week after 195 nations, including Australia, agreed in
Paris to try and limit global warming to 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit)
over pre-industrial levels.
Hunt said
he was comfortable that good-quality Australian coal would feed Indian
electricity consumption.
"If
they didn't have Australian participation... they would be using lower quality
fuel," he told ABC radio.
"So
lower quality fuel and lower efficiency (power) stations -- so the net global
impact of not using Australian fuels would be for emissions to go up, not
down."
'Illogical, irresponsible'
Adani,
which has previously accused environmental activists of exploiting legal
loopholes to stall its massive open-cut and underground mine which is forecast
to produce 60 million tonnes of thermal coal a year for export, welcomed the
decision.
"The
expansion of Abbot Point, the lifeblood of Bowen, is key to Adani's plans to
deliver 10,000 direct and indirect jobs and Aus$22 billion in taxes and
royalties to Queensland," it said in a statement.
Critics argue
that plunging coal prices make the development financially unviable, while
major European and US banks have refused funding due to environmental concerns.
Greenpeace
said the Abbot Point go-ahead was "irresponsible for the reef, illogical
and unnecessary".
"Adani
hasn't got the Aus$16 billion, no-one's lending it to them, and coal prices are
tanking. Even the International Energy Agency is questioning the project,"
said Greenpeace reef campaigner Shani Tager.
WWF-Australia
said the waters around Abbot Point were home to dugongs, sea turtles and
snubfin dolphins while the dredge spoil would be dumped on land adjacent to
wetlands used by migratory birds.
"It's
disappointing that the minister has approved this project within the Great
Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, despite the damage it will do,"
spokeswoman Louise Matthiesson said.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.