With each
new deluge the UK learns nothing, unlike the Netherlands, which has adapted to
the changing nature of the threat
![]() |
| York city centre is covered by floodwater after the River Ouse bursts its banks. Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA |
When more
than 1,800 people died in the wake of the 1953 North Sea flood in the
Netherlands, the national reaction was: never again. The resulting Delta programme to close off the south-western river delta from the sea was so bold
that its name became synonymous with dealing with a crisis. If an issue needs a
major response, you can be sure that a Dutch politician will call for a “Delta
plan to tackle X”. It is time that the UK took some of that attitude and got a
Delta plan to tackle flooding.
Flooding has become an almost annual event in the UK. We are waiting for the next storm
and flash flood to hit, with another group – or even the same group – of people
evacuated, all followed by the promise of some money for a bit of flood defence
work. As a nation, we can no longer afford to accept that. Consider the
personal misery for those affected, even in areas not traditionally flood-prone
like Manchester and Leeds. Consider that the financial cost of these events will
continue to rise – and not only for the government. Every home insurance policy
now includes a £10.50 Flood Re levy to subsidise insurance for homes with a
high risk of flooding.
With the
climate changing and becoming more volatile, we can expect heavier rain and
more severe storms. Water management systems in the UK, and in particular in
England, are unable to deal with what lies ahead.
After
almost every flood, journalists and policymakers go to the Netherlands to learn
how they are adapting to climate change and what lessons there are for the UK.
We see Dutch projects in the news, such as a neighbourhood with floating homes
that forms part of a major national programme to create space for the rivers.
But those lessons never seem to be taken on board. Come the next flood, off
they all go to Holland again.
For the
Dutch, water management goes to the core of their national identity. The
country was forged in the battle against water. This common fight led to the
pooling of resources and decision-making in regional water authorities – among
the oldest democratic institutions in the world – which continue that work
today. The national habit of consensus decision-making in tackling major issues
became known internationally in the 90s as the “polder model”, echoing its
water-based roots. No Dutch politician wants to be part of the generation that
fails in the common endeavour against water, and no voter would accept someone
caught sleeping on their watch.
The
Netherlands has adapted to the changing nature of the threat. Today, the
biggest danger is not the sea swallowing the land but the rain overwhelming it.
The main focus no longer is building higher dykes and bigger dams, like they
did after the 1953 flood. Instead, the Dutch have spent the past decade
deepening and widening rivers, creating new side canals that provide extra
capacity, and setting aside land as dedicated flood plains. This €2.3bn (£1.7bn) project is still ongoing. All this so that when the water does come,
the swollen rivers can expand without flooding homes and causing misery.
In Britain,
we need to start to realise and accept that flooding is becoming an equally
existential issue. There can be no northern powerhouse or sustainable prosperity
anywhere if it risks being swept away by the rain. That message is not always
clear in Westminster, where the focus is on the quick fix today. The polder
model feels far away from the much more combative nature of Westminster – and
from Holyrood and Cardiff, too.
We need a
Dutch-style national response in the UK, with the necessary funding. The
British landscape demands it even more than the Dutch flat countryside. With
heavy rainfall flowing down the hills into lower-lying areas, those places need
investment in rivers and landscapes able to absorb that water, transport it
away from homes quickly or temporarily store it on empty flood plains. We need
to stop building in at-risk areas, setting those places aside as buffers to
protect existing homes. When and wherever we build, we need to think about how
we manage water in that area.
This will
require some tough decisions and difficult public debates. The respective
environment agencies in England, Scotland and Wales have much of the expertise,
but need the political will and funding. A start would be a UK Delta plan. But
first the prime minister and the first ministers of Scotland and Wales must
truly resolve: “never again”.
![]() |
The Eastern Scheldt storm surge barrier
(Oosterscheldekering) in Vrouwenpolder,
The
Netherlands (AFP Photo/Bas Czerwinski)
|
Related Articles:


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.