![]() |
| Scientists have said the reef suffered a 'catastrophic die-off' of coral during an extended heatwave in 2016 (AFP Photo/GREG TORDA) |
Sydney
(AFP) - Australia pledged half a billion dollars to restore and protect the
Great Barrier Reef Sunday in what it said would be a game-changer for the
embattled natural wonder, but conservationists were not convinced.
The World
Heritage-listed site, which attracts millions of tourists, is reeling from
significant bouts of coral bleaching due to warming sea temperatures linked to
climate change.
It is also
under threat from the coral-eating crown-of-thorns starfish, which has
proliferated due to pollution and agricultural runoff.
Prime
Minister Malcolm Turnbull said more than Aus$500 million ($400 million) would
go towards improving water quality, tackling predators, and expanding
restoration efforts.
Turnbull
said it was the "largest ever single investment -- to protect the reef,
secure its viability and the 64,000 jobs that rely on the reef".
"We
want to ensure the reef's future for the benefit of all Australians,
particularly those whose livelihood depends on the reef," he added.
The reef is
a critical national asset, contributing Aus$6.4 billion a year to the
Australian economy.
Canberra
has previously committed more than Aus$2.0 billion to protect the site over the
next decade, but has been criticised for backing a huge coal project by Indian
mining giant Adani nearby.
With its
heavy use of coal-fired power and relatively small population, Australia is
considered one of the world's worst per-capita greenhouse gas polluters.
Canberra
insists it is taking strong action to address the global threat of climate
change, having set an ambitious target to reduce emissions by 26 to 28 percent
from 2005 levels by 2030.
Turnbull
said part of the money will be used to mitigate the impacts of climate change,
but gave no details.
Conservationists
said while the funding was "an important step", the biggest threat to
the reef was global warming and not enough was being done to combat it by
embracing clean energy.
"Science
is well aware of what's killing the coral. It's the excess heat from burning
fossil fuels," said Bill McKibben, founder of the global grassroots
climate movement 350.org.
"To
simultaneously promote the world's biggest coal mine (Adani) while pretending
to care about the world's largest reef is an acrobatic feat only a cynical
politician would attempt."
Australian
Conservation Foundation chief Kelly O'Shanassy agreed.
"Our
elected representatives can't have it both ways," she said. "Climate
change is the number one threat to the Great Barrier Reef and only concerted
action to cut pollution will fully protect it."
Resilient
reef
The bulk of
the new funding -- just over Aus$200 million -- was earmarked to improve water
quality by changing farming practices and adopting new technologies and land
management.
"The
money will go towards improving water quality, working with farmers to prevent
sediment, nitrogen and pesticide runoff into the reef," said Environment
Minister Josh Frydenberg.
"It
will ensure that we tackle the crown-of-thorns... and use the best available
science to ensure our coral is resilient to heat and light stress."
He said the
government would work with traditional Aboriginal owners, the tourist industry,
farmers and scientists, to save the reef, calling the commitment "a
game-changer".
Earlier
this month, scientists said the site suffered a "catastrophic
die-off" of coral during an extended heatwave in 2016, threatening a
broader range of reef life than previously feared.
A study in
the journal Nature said some 30 percent of the reef's coral perished, the first
of an unprecedented two successive years of coral bleaching along the
2,300-kilometre (1,400-mile) reef.
VIDEO: Conservationists say the funding is "an important step", but the biggest threat to the Great Barrier Reef is global warming and not enough is being done to combat it by embracing clean energy pic.twitter.com/csuiU7EAXj— AFP news agency (@AFP) April 30, 2018

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.